<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Instone-Brewer Responds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/blog/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds</link>
	<description>ALERT: Dr. Köstenberger’s blogs are now becoming available in Spanish. We will continue to add new posts as soon as they can be translated. Click on “Espanol” above</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:55:50 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Costa</title>
		<link>http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/blog/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds/comment-page-1#comment-82768</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Costa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/?p=157#comment-82768</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with Frank. Dr. IB has done a masterful job in treating the subject. This is evident from the books he has written which includes much of his research.
It seems that until we can see the issue of divorce with the eyes of a first century Jew, we cannot quite understand the meaning of Jesus&#039; and Paul&#039;s (for Romans) teaching on the matter.
The bottom line, whatever teaching Jesus gave on divorce and remarriage is not a license for &quot;no-fault&quot; divorce but has to be congruent with grace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with Frank. Dr. IB has done a masterful job in treating the subject. This is evident from the books he has written which includes much of his research.<br />
It seems that until we can see the issue of divorce with the eyes of a first century Jew, we cannot quite understand the meaning of Jesus&#8217; and Paul&#8217;s (for Romans) teaching on the matter.<br />
The bottom line, whatever teaching Jesus gave on divorce and remarriage is not a license for &#8220;no-fault&#8221; divorce but has to be congruent with grace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/blog/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds/comment-page-1#comment-80235</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/?p=157#comment-80235</guid>
		<description>Just to put my two cents in here, I &#039;d like to say that after carefully reading Dr. IB&#039;s book on this as well as Mr. Piper&#039;s response, I really feel Dr. IB has used much sounder hermeneutics in understanding this difficult topic.  

Mr. Piper has obviously fallen into the traditional snare of embracing a &quot;current day&quot; approach to reading these passages rather than putting them into the context in which they were written.  

I have yet to see a sounder approach to this topic than what Dr. IB has presented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to put my two cents in here, I &#8216;d like to say that after carefully reading Dr. IB&#8217;s book on this as well as Mr. Piper&#8217;s response, I really feel Dr. IB has used much sounder hermeneutics in understanding this difficult topic.  </p>
<p>Mr. Piper has obviously fallen into the traditional snare of embracing a &#8220;current day&#8221; approach to reading these passages rather than putting them into the context in which they were written.  </p>
<p>I have yet to see a sounder approach to this topic than what Dr. IB has presented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Brief at 4:14 evangelical christian theology blog</title>
		<link>http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/blog/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds/comment-page-1#comment-56716</link>
		<dc:creator>In Brief at 4:14 evangelical christian theology blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/?p=157#comment-56716</guid>
		<description>[...] The New Testament on Divorce: A interesting insight into current debate sparked by David Instone-Brewer&#8217;s article in Christianity Today. John Piper then responded, followed by this response and follow-up by Andreas Kostenberger. Very roughly speaking, Instone-Brewer considers the NT to encourage grace after a necessary divorce, John Piper believes re-marriage is never right, and Kostenberger takes the middle-ground. Instone-Brewer follows up the debate with some clarification here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New Testament on Divorce: A interesting insight into current debate sparked by David Instone-Brewer&#8217;s article in Christianity Today. John Piper then responded, followed by this response and follow-up by Andreas Kostenberger. Very roughly speaking, Instone-Brewer considers the NT to encourage grace after a necessary divorce, John Piper believes re-marriage is never right, and Kostenberger takes the middle-ground. Instone-Brewer follows up the debate with some clarification here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Divorce Dialogue Continues &#171; Pastoral Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/blog/bible/david-instone-brewer-responds/comment-page-1#comment-27842</link>
		<dc:creator>The Divorce Dialogue Continues &#171; Pastoral Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 01:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biblicalfoundations.org/?p=157#comment-27842</guid>
		<description>[...] Kostenberger    &#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kostenberger    &nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
