The book Believer’s Baptism: Sign of the New Covenant in Christ (ed. Thomas R. Schreiner and Shawn D. Wright; Nashville: B & H), has stirred a considerable amount of discussion. In his endorsement of the volume, Daniel Akin says the book “is destined to be a classic concerning the doctrine of baptism.” Wayne Grudem says this is “a challenging book that may well cause many readers to re-think their own positions on baptism.” Contributors to the volume include Bob Stein, Tom Schreiner, Stephen Wellum, Steve McKinion, Jonathan Rainbow, Shawn Wright, Duane Garrett, Ardel Caneday, Mark Dever, and myself. Here is an excerpt from the conclusion of my essay on “Baptism in the Gospels” (pp. 33–34).
“First, the rite of baptism is designed for believers who have repented of their sin and have put their faith in God and in his Christ. Believer’s baptism is presupposed by both John’s baptism and the Matthean “Great Commission” passage. This does not mean that fairly young people, say, at the age of seven or eight, should be barred from receiving believer’s baptism if they have genuinely understood the implications of Christ’s death on their behalf and have repented of their sin and placed their faith in Jesus Christ. However, the Gospels provide no evidence or support for the baptism of infants, nor does the principle of believer’s baptism enunciated in the Gospels allow for such a practice. In fact, if (as is sometimes alleged) Jews were predisposed to baptize infants owing to the parallel with circumcision, it is remarkable—in fact, striking—that there is no mention of infant baptism anywhere in Jesus’ teaching recorded in the Gospels.
Second, baptism is an essential part of Christian discipleship. This is clear from the Matthean “Great Commission” passage, where disciple-making is said to consist of baptizing converts and of teaching them to obey the commands of Jesus (see also John 4:1). An obedient church will take to heart the risen Christ’s command to engage in mission and evangelistic preaching, seeking to engender conversions that ensue in baptism, instruction, and Christian growth. On an individual level, those who have placed their faith in Jesus Christ and have repented of their sin must be baptized as part of their Christian discipleship. While there may be a period of instruction preceding baptism, no undue obstacle should be placed in the path of a person who is genuinely converted and desirous of baptism.
Third, the mode of John’s and Jesus’ baptism was most likely that of immersion. This is suggested by the root meaning of the word baptō, “to dip” (e.g., Josh 3:15 LXX; Ruth 2:14 LXX baptizō, “to baptize,” is an intensive or frequentative form. It is also indicated by the LXX usage of baptizō with reference to immersion (see 2 Kgs 5:14). Another piece of supporting evidence is the statement that Jesus “came up immediately from the water” subsequent to his baptism (Matt 3:16 par. Mark 1:10: euthus anebē/anabainōn apo/ek tou hudatos). While there are differences of view as to the way in which baptism by immersion ought to be stipulated in church polity, evidence from the Gospels suggests that this was in fact the NT and early church’s mode of baptism.
Fourth, theologically, water baptism presupposes spiritual regeneration as a prevenient and primary work of God in and through the person of the Holy Spirit. This follows plainly from the Baptist’s announcement that the Messiah would baptize people in the Spirit. Thus repentance from sin and faith in Christ, accompanied by regeneration, are logically and chronologically prior to water baptism. This, in turn, puts water baptism in proper perspective. There is no warrant in the Gospels for the notion of baptismal regeneration. There is also no support for viewing baptism as a sacrament, a sacred rite which mediates some sort of special grace to the recipient of baptism by virtue of the intrinsic efficacy of the rite (ex operere operato).”
“There is also no support for viewing baptism as a sacrament…”
Are we now down to one sacrament, Dr. Koestenberger (Lord’s Supper)? It is an awfully big jump to define “sacrament” as that which is ex opere operato. I know of no paedo-Baptist (outside the Roman Catholic Church) who holds to an ex opere operato position. You’re knocking down a straw man. Am I misunderstanding you?
I’m very grateful for your strategic ministry! May God multiply it.
Thank you so much for this. As a pastor of a Southern Baptist Church and a student at SEBTS, I look forward to reading the whole book. I have struggled over when to baptize a younger child, but even this is dealt with here. Thank you so much for you contribution to what I am sure will be a great book.
Dr. Kostenberger,
Thank you for you work in this area. I am inquiring as to what connection you see between “repentance from sin and faith in Christ” and “accompanied by regeneration.” Does the prior repentance and faith always entail the other, and if not, how does Baptistic theology handle this? In the end, how is this any different from baptizing on a credible profession? Thank you for your work for the sake of the Name.
Indeed. Well-said. I’m still wrestling with the baptism of young children, but we have at least a couple of years until our 10-month old daughter gets there. So I’m hoping to be fully persuaded! Thanks for writing on this topic.
Blessings,
Alex
Thank you for this exellent summary and introduction to this important matter. Since you broached the subject of circumcision, how do you reply to those who counter that baptism has replaced circumcision as the sign of the covenant and support their statement by appealing to Col 2:11-13?
Thank you for your excellent site and helpful discussions.
By way of response to your comments:
Regarding baptism as a sacrament:
As far as I know, Roman Catholics do in fact define “sacrament” as ex opere operato, and Roman Catholic teaching is what I am addressing here. My point is that I do not believe it is scriptural, as the RCC teaches, that baptism (or other sacraments) is effective in and of itself apart from the faith of the individual baptized.
Regarding regeneration:
On the basis of passages such as Titus 3:5-7, it is my understanding that regeneration occurs when a person repents and places their faith in Jesus Christ.
Regarding circumcision:
I take the reference to circumcision in Col 2:11-12 to be to the crucifixion of Christ, the “cutting off” of whose flesh fulfilled circumcision. Hence it is not baptism that takes the place of circumcision but Christ’s crucifixion serves as its fulfillment, while baptism is a new covenant ordinance signifiying union with Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection per Rom. 6:3-4. See the (to my mind) compelling treatment of Col 2:11-12 in the Colossians commentary by P. T. O’Brien in the WBC series pp. 114-21.
Dear Dr. Kostenberger: Re Baptism
I realize the date of the article is 2007 but I have just discovered your blog and will consider purchasing another book on baptism in reading your conclusion.
I have practiced believers baptism but surely a broader view is needed. Are we to conclude that many of the Church Fathers, Martin Luther, John Calvin and most of those in the Anglican, Presbyterian, and Lutheran churches are unbaptized believers because they were baptized as infants? or have not been immersed?
We argue as if the other side had no argument or Scriptural basis for their own conviction. This has troubled me for 50 years. I would like a reply but realize that you are too busy to answer you many emails but I am sure my concern is the concern of many.
Yours in Christ, Ron Harris